Scope creep
An examination opened on one issue becomes an examination of three, because a helpful answer opened a door that was not previously open.
Tax service
You do not have to speak to the examiner. With a Form 2848 on file we handle the correspondence, control what is produced, and keep the examination inside its stated scope.
The problem
Not because taxpayers are dishonest, but because they answer questions that were never asked.
An examination opened on one issue becomes an examination of three, because a helpful answer opened a door that was not previously open.
Handing over everything requested, and a little more to seem cooperative, routinely surfaces issues the examiner had no intention of looking at.
A statutory notice of deficiency carries a 90-day petition window that cannot be extended. Miss it and the assessment stands, regardless of merit.
What we do
Our managing partner is a CPA and a Certified Internal Auditor. Understanding how examiners build a case is directly useful in dismantling one.
How it works
Four stages, with a defined deliverable at each one. You always know where the work stands.
Power of attorney filed, deadlines calendared, and the examiner told that all contact now comes through us.
We review the return, the underlying records and the examiner's likely theory before responding to anything.
Document requests answered precisely and on time, with our own narrative framing the facts.
Agreement where the position is right, Appeals where it is not, and a clear recommendation on which is which.
Who it's for
From a single automated notice to a full field examination of a multi-entity group.
Deliverables
Questions
For a simple math-error notice, often yes. For anything asking about substantiation, methodology or specific deductions, no. The risk is not that you will say something untrue: it is that you will volunteer context that expands the examination. Examiners are trained to follow what they are given. Represented taxpayers produce less and close faster.
A mix of automated scoring, third-party document matching, and specific issue campaigns. Common triggers in businesses our size include S-corp owners taking distributions with little or no wages, large or unusual Schedule C deductions, research credit claims from contingency-fee studies, worker classification patterns, and mismatches between K-1s and personal returns. Some selections are simply random.
A correspondence examination often closes in three to six months. A field examination of an operating business commonly runs nine to eighteen. Appeals adds several months more. The single biggest driver of duration is how quickly and completely each information request is answered, which is one of the practical arguments for representation.
Then we say so, quantify it accurately, and focus on the parts that matter: correct measurement of the adjustment, penalty abatement where reasonable cause exists, and preventing the issue from expanding into other years. Defending an indefensible position damages your credibility on the issues where you are actually right.
Related
Decode the notice, abate the penalty, close the file.
Learn moreAuditor-built controls that keep every filing clean.
Learn moreCredits you have earned and can defend on audit.
Learn moreA 30-minute review is usually enough to tell you whether you are leaving money on the table, carrying compliance risk, or both.